小編導(dǎo)讀：高頓網(wǎng)校2015年FRM考試輔導(dǎo)高清課程、免費(fèi)題庫已經(jīng)開通，通過針對(duì)性地講解、訓(xùn)練、答疑、?？迹瑢?duì)學(xué)習(xí)過程進(jìn)行全程跟蹤、分析、指導(dǎo)，可以幫助考生全面提升備考效果。高頓FRM題庫>>>點(diǎn)擊進(jìn)入“每日一練——免費(fèi)在線測(cè)試”
　
Basel II requires a backtest of a bank’s internal value at risk (VaR) model (IMA). Assume the bank’s ten-day 99% VaR is $1 million (minimum of 99% is hard-wired per Basel). The null hypothesis is: the VaR model is accurate. Out of 1,000 observations, 25 exceptions are observed (we saw the actual loss exceed the VaR 25 out of 1000 observations). (Binomial CDF p[x ≤ 24] = 99.996%)
　　A.     We will probably call the VaR model good (accurate) but we risk a Type I error.
　　B.     We will probably call the VaR model good (accurate) but we risk a Type II error.
　　C.     We will probably call the model bad (inaccurate) but we risk a Type I error.
　　D.     We will probably call the model bad (inaccurate) but we risk a Type II error.
　　Answer: C
　　The probability of 25 or more exceptions will only be observed 1 – 99.996%. So, we reject the model. Null = good model. To decide the model is bad model is to reject null and this implies a risk of type I error.