您還會為FRM考試感到煩惱嗎？高頓網(wǎng)校精品題庫，包含歷年真題，模擬試題等題型，題題結(jié)合考試大綱貼近考試考點。堅持每天做題練習(xí)，一定可以提升備考效果，為贏取屬于自己的美好明天加油吧！馬上開始練習(xí) >>>
　　In the case of Barings Bank, Nick Leesson incurred huge tradinglosses because:
　　a. he had broad powers and weak managementoversight, which permitted
　　speculative trading and the resultinglosses to be hidden.
　　b. Barings Bank had insufficient liquidityto cover marked-to-market losses.
　　c. the size of Barings' positions was toolarge in relation to the liquidity of the contracts being used.
　　d. the market in Nikkei 225 futurescontracts shifted from contango to normal backwardation.
　　答案解析：選A
　　The basic problem at Barings was operationrisk control. Nick Leeson was in charge of trading and settlement. This dualresponsibility allowed him to hide losses by crossing trades at fabricatedprices. He then booked the profitable side of the trade in accounts that werereported and the unprofitable side in an unreported account. The lack of supervisionalso permitted him to shift from hedged trading strategies to speculative strategiesin an effort to hide previously incurred losses. Liquidity, position size, and contangoare all issues in the Metallgesellschaft case, not Barings. (See Book 1. Topic6)
        FRM考試在線高清視頻指導(dǎo)